Bibliography 

Ando, Clifford. 2011. Law, Language, and Empire in the Roman Tradition. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Annas, Julia. 1989. “Cicero on Stoic Moral Philosophy and Private Property.” In Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, edited by Miriam T. Griffin and Jonathan Barnes. Oxford University Press.

Annas, Julia, and Gábor Betegh, eds. 2016. Cicero’s De Finibus: Philosophical Approaches. Cambridge University Press.

Armitage, David. 2012. “What’s the Big Idea? Intellectual History and the Longue Durée.” History of European Ideas 38 (4): 493–507.

———. 2017. Civil Wars: A History in Ideas. New York.

Asmis, Elizabeth. 2004. “The State as a Partnership: Cicero’s Definition of Res Publica in His Work On the State.” History of Political Thought 25 (4): 569–98.

———. 2008. “Cicero on Natural Law and the Laws of the State.” Classical Antiquity 27 (1): 1–33.

Atkins, E. M. 1990. “‘Domina Et Regina Virtutum’: Justice and Societas in De Officiis.” Phronesis 35 (1): 258–89.

———. 2000. “Cicero.” In The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, edited by Christopher Rowe and Malcolm Schofield, 477–516. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Atkins, Jed W. 2013. Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason: The Republic and Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. 2018. Roman Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. 2023. “Cicero on the Justice of War.” In Power and Persuasion in Cicero’s Philosophy, edited by Nathan Gilbert, Margaret Graver and Sean McConnell, 170-204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Atkins, Jed W. and Thomas Bénatouïl. 2021. The Cambridge Companion to Cicero’s Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bayle, Pierre. 1740. Dictionnaire historique et critique. 5th ed. Vol. 4. Amsterdam.

Baynes, Norman Hepburn. 1968. The Political Ideas of St. Augustine’s De Civitate Dei. Historical Association.

Benton, Lauren, and Benjamin Straumann. 2010. “Acquiring Empire by Law: From Roman Doctrine to Early Modern European Practice.” Law and History Review 28 (01): 1–38. doi:10.1017/S0738248009990022.

Berlin, Isaiah. 2013. “The Originality of Machiavelli.” In Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas, edited by Henry Hardy, 2nd ed., 33–100. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Bock, Gisela, Quentin Skinner, Maurizio Viroli, and European Culture Research Centre, eds. 1993. Machiavelli and Republicanism. Cambridge [England]; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bowen, Anthony, and Peter Garnsey, eds. 2004. Lactantius: Divine Institutes. Liverpool University Press.

Brooke, Christopher. 2012. Philosophic Pride: Stoicism and Political Thought from Lipsius to Rousseau. Princeton University Press.

Brouwer, René. 2021. Law and Philosophy in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brüllmann, Philipp und Jörn Müller, Hg. 2023. Cicero: De officiis. De Gruyter.

Brunt, P. A. 1978. “Laus Imperii.” In Imperialism in the Ancient World, edited by Peter Garnsey and C. R. Whittaker, 163–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Büchner, Karl. 1984. M. Tullius Cicero: De re publica: Kommentar. C. Winter.

Cancelli, F. 1972. “‘Iuris consensu’ nella definizione Ciceroniana di ‘res publica.’” RCCM 14: 247–67.

Christes, Johannes. 1980. “Christliche und heidnisch-römische Gerechtigkeit in Augustins Werk ‘De civitate Dei.’” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 123 (2): 163–77.

Colish, Marcia L. 1978. “Cicero’s De Officiis and Machiavelli’s Prince.” Sixteenth Century Journal 9 (4): 80–93. doi:10.2307/2540045.

Deane, Herbert Andrew. 1963. The Political and Social Ideas of St. Augustine. Columbia University Press.

Deproost, Paul-Augustin. 1979. Étude comparative du “De Republica” de Cicéron et du “De Civitate Dei” de saint Augustin: civitas-virtus-iustitia. Université catholique de Louvain.

Digeser, Elizabeth DePalma. 2006. “Religion, Law and the Roman Polity: The Era of the Great Persecution.” In Religion and Law in Classical and Christian Rome, edited by Clifford Ando and Jörg Rüpke, 68–84. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.

Dyck, Andrew R. 1997. A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. University of Michigan Press.

———. 2004. A Commentary on Cicero, De Legibus. University of Michigan Press.

Edelstein, Dan and Benjamin Straumann. 2022. “Roman Rights Talk: Subjective Rights in Cicero and Livy.” History of Political Thought 43.4: 637-659.

———. 2023. “On the Liberties of the Ancients: Licentiousness, Equal Rights, and the Rule of Law.” History of European Ideas: 1-24.

Ferrary, Jean-Louis. 1974. “Le discours de Laelius dans le troisième livre du De Re Publica de Cicéron.” Mélanges de l’Ecole Française de Rome. Antiquité 86 (2): 745–71. doi:10.3406/mefr.1974.988.

———. 1977. “Le discours de Philus (Cicéron, De Re Publica, III, 8-31) et la philosophie de Carnéade.” Revue des études latines 55: 128–56.

———. 1988. Philhellénisme et impérialisme. Aspects idéologiques de la conquête romaine du monde hellénistique, de la seconde guerre de Macédoine à la guerre contre Mithridate. Rome.

———. 1995. “The Statesman and the Law in the Political Philosophy of Cicero.” In Justice and Generosity. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511518485.004.

Fleischacker, Samuel. 2004. A Short History of Distributive Justice. Harvard University Press.

Fortin, E. L. 1997. “Justice as the Foundation of the Political Community: Augustine and his Pagan Models.” In Augustinus: De civitate dei, edited by Christoph Horn, 41–62. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

Fox, Matthew. 2013. “Cicero during the Enlightenment.” In C. Steel (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero, ch. 17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. 2016. “Cicero and Historicism: Controversies in Cicero’s Reception in the Eighteenth Century.” In G. Manuwald (ed.), The Afterlife of Cicero, 144-161. London.

Garnsey, Peter. 2002. “Lactantius and Augustine.” In Representations of Empire: Rome and the Mediterranean World, edited by Alan K. Bowman, Hannah M. Cotton, Martin Goodman, and Simon Price, 153–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.britishacademypublications.com/view/10.5871/bacad/9780197262764.001.0001/bacad-9780197262764.

———. 2008. Thinking about Property: From Antiquity to the Age of Revolution. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press.

Gawlick, Günter. 1963. “Cicero and the Enlightenment.” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 25: 657–82.

van Gelderen, M. and Q. Skinner, eds. 2002. Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gentili, Alberico. 2011. The Wars of the Romans:A Critical Edition and Translation of De Armis Romanis: A Critical Edition and Translation of De Armis Romanis. Ed. by Benedict Kingsbury and Benjamin Straumann, trans. by David Lupher. Oxford University Press.

Gilbert, N., M. Graver and S. McConnell, eds. 2023. Power and Persuasion in Cicero’s Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Girardet, Klaus M. 1983. Die Ordnung der Welt: ein Beitrag zur philosophischen und politischen Interpretation von Ciceros Schrift De legibus. Steiner.

———. 1989. “‘Naturrecht’ bei Aristoteles und bei Cicero (De Legibus): ein Vergleich.” In Cicero’s Knowledge of the Peripatos, 114–32. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

———. 1995. “Naturrecht und Naturgesetz: eine gerade Linie von Cicero zu Augustinus?” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 138 (3/4). Neue Folge: 266–98.

Glucker, John. 2001. “Carneades in Rome: Some Unsolved Problems.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 45 (S76): 57–82. doi:10.1111/j.2041-5370.2001.tb02127.x.

Griffin, Miriam. 1996. “When Is Thought Political?” Apeiron 29 (3): 269–82.

———. 2008. “Iure Plectimur: The Roman Critique of Roman Imperialism.” In East & West: Papers in Ancient History Presented to GlenW. Bowersock, edited by G. W. Bowersock, T. Corey Brennan, and Harriet I. Flower, 85–111. Loeb Classical Monographs 14. Cambridge, Mass. ; London: Dept. of the Classics, Harvard University : Distributed by Harvard University Press.

———. 2011. “The Politics of Virtue: Three Puzzles in Cicero’s De Officiis.” In Episteme, etc.: Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes, edited by B. Morison and K. Ierodiakonou, 310-328. Oxford University Press.

———. 2013. “Latin Philosophy and Roman Law.” In Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy, edited by Verity Harte and Melissa Lane, 96–116. Cambridge University Press.

Haakonssen, Knud. 1996. Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Hahmann, Andree and Michael Vasquez, eds. 2024. Cicero as Philosopher: Interpretation and Legacy. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Hammer, Dean. 2014. Roman Political Thought: From Cicero to Augustine. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hand, V. 1970. Augustin und das klassisch römische Selbstverständnis. Eine Untersuchung über die Begriffe gloria, virtus, iustitia und res publica in De civitate Dei. Hamburger Philologische Studien 13. Hamburg.

Hanke, Lewis. 1959. Aristotle and the American Indians: A Study in Race Prejudice in the Modern World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Hawley, Michael. 2019. “Cicero’s Duties and Adam Smith’s Sentiments.” History of European Ideas 45 (5): 705-720.

———. 2021. “Locke’s Ciceronian Liberalism.” Perspectives on Political Science.

———. 2022. Natural Law Republicanism: Cicero’s Liberal Legacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Heck, E. 1966. Die Bezeugung von Ciceros Schrift de Re Publica. Hildesheim.

Horn, Christoph, ed. 1997. Augustinus: De civitate dei. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

———. 1999. “Augustinus über Tugend, Moralität und das höchste Gut.” In Zur Rezeption der hellenistischen Philosophie in der Spätantike: Akten der 1. Tagung der Karl-und-Gertrud-Abel-Stiftung vom 22.-25. September 1997 in Trier, edited by Therese Fuhrer, Michael Erler, and Karin Schlapbach, 173–90. Stuttgart: Steiner.

———. 2007. “Politische Gerechtigkeit bei Cicero und Augustinus.” Etica & Politica / Ethics and Politics 9 (2): 46–70.

Inwood, Brad, and Fred Dycus Miller. 2007. “Law in Roman Philosophy.” In A History of the Philosophy of Law from the Ancient Greeks to the Scholastics, edited by Fred Dycus Miller and Carrie-Ann Biondi, 133–65. Springer.

Irwin, Terence. 2007. The Development of Ethics: A Historical and Critical Study Volume I: From Socrates to the Reformation. 1st ed. Oxford University Press, USA.

Kapust, Daniel, and Gary Remer. 2021. The Ciceronian Tradition in Political Theory. University of Wisconsin Press.

Kingsbury, B. and B. Straumann. 2010a. “The State of Nature versus Commercial Sociability as the Basis of International Law: Reflections on the Roman Foundations and Current Interpretations of the International Political and Legal Thought of Grotius, Hobbes and Pufendorf” In The Philosophy of International Law, ed. by S. Besson and J. Tasioulas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2010b. The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations:Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire. OUP Oxford.

Kohns, H. 1974. “Consensus iuris - communio utilitatis.” Gymnasium 81: 485–98.

Koskenniemi, Martti. 2011. “The Political Theology of Trade Law: The Scholastic Contribution.” In From Bilateralism to Community Interest, edited by Ulrich Fastenrath et al. Oxford.

Krause, Wilhelm. 1958. Die Stellung der frühchristlichen Autoren zur heidnischen Literatur. Wien: Herder.

Lee, Daniel. 2011. “Popular Liberty, Princely Government, and the Roman Law in Hugo Grotius’s De Jure Belli Ac Pacis.” Journal of the History of Ideas 72 (3): 371–92. doi:10.1353/jhi.2011.0024.

———. 2013. “‘Office Is a Thing Borrowed’ Jean Bodin on Offices and Seigneurial Government.” Political Theory 41 (3): 409–40. doi:10.1177/0090591713476050.

Lefèvre, Eckard. 2001. Panaitios’ und Ciceros Pflichtenlehre: Vom philosophischen Traktat zum politischen Lehrbuch. Stuttgart: Steiner, Franz.

Long, A. A. 1995. “Cicero’s Politics in De Officiis.” In Justice and Generosity, edited by Andre Laks and Malcolm Schofield. Cambridge.

Lovejoy, A. O. 1940. “Reflections on the History of Ideas.” Journal of the History of Ideas 1 (1940): 3-23.

Lupher, David. 2003. Romans in a New World: Classical Models in Sixteenth-Century Spanish America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

———. 2010. “The De Armis Romanis and the Exemplum of Roman Imperialism.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 85–100. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Maier, Franz Georg. 1955. Augustin und das antike Rom / Franz Georg Maier. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

Manuwald, Gesine, ed. 2016. The Afterlife of Cicero. London.

Markus, R. A. 1989. Saeculum: History and Society in the Theology of St Augustine. Cambridge University Press.

Marshall, John. 1994. John Locke: Resistance, Religion and Responsibility. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

McDaniel, Iain. 2013. Adam Ferguson in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Roman Past and Europe’s Future. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Meier, Christian. 1980. Res publica amissa: Eine Studie zu Verfassung und Geschichte der späten römischen Republik. 3rd ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Moatti, Claudia. 1997. La raison de Rome : Naissance de l’esprit critique à la fin de la République. Paris: Seuil.

Monson, Andrew. 2023. “Taxing Wealth in the Just City: Cicero and the Roman Census.” Journal of Roman Studies.

Nederman, Cary J. 2020. The Bonds of Humanity: Cicero’s Legacies in European Social and Political Thought, ca. 1100-ca. 1550. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Nelson, Eric. 2004. The Greek Tradition in Republican Thought. Cambridge University Press.

Nippel, Wilfried. 1980. Mischverfassungstheorie und Verfassungsrealität in Antike und früher Neuzeit. Ernst Klett.

———. 2008. Antike oder moderne Freiheit? Die Begründung der Demokratie in Athen und in der Neuzeit. Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.

———. 2012. “Saving the Constitution: The European Discourse on Dictatorship.” In In the Footsteps of Herodotus. Towards European Political Thought, 29–49. Florence: Leo S. Olschki.

Nörr, Dieter. 1974. Rechtskritik in der römischen Antike. München: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften : In Kommission bei C.H. Beck.

Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Books.

Nussbaum, Martha. 1997. “Kant and Stoic Cosmopolitanism.” Journal of Political Philosophy 5 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00021.

———. 2000. “Duties of Justice, Duties of Material Aid: Cicero’s Problematic Legacy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (2): 176–206. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00098.

———. 2002. “Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism.” In For Love of Country?, edited by Martha Nussbaum and Joshua Cohen, 1st edition, 3–20. Boston: Beacon Press.

———. 2013. Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

O’Daly, Gerard J. P. 2004. Augustine’s City of God: A Reader’s Guide. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Panizza, Diego. 1981. Alberico Gentili, giurista ideologo nell'Inghilterra elisabettiana. Padova.

Perreau-Saussine, Emile. 2007. “Quentin Skinner in Context.” The Review of Politics 69 (01): 106–22. doi:10.1017/S0034670507000332.

Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism a Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press ; Oxford University Press.

Pocock, John Greville Agard. 2003. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton [etc.]: Princeton University Press.

Podes, Stephan. 1991. “Die Krise der späten römischen Republik und Ciceros Rechtsphilosophie (de Legibus) : Bedingungen der Möglichkeit zur Alternative?” Archiv für Rechts- und Staatsphilosophie 77: 84–94.

Pollmann, Karla, and Willemien Otten. 2013. The Oxford Guide to the Historical Reception of Augustine.

Popkin, Richard Henry. 2003. The History of Scepticism: From Savonarola Bayle. Oxford [etc.]: Oxford Univ. Press.

Rahe, Paul Anthony. 1994. Republics Ancient and Modern: Inventions of Prudence: Constituting the American Regime. UNC Press Books.

———. 2008. Against Throne and Altar: Machiavelli and Political Theory Under the English Republic. Cambridge University Press.

Rawson, Elizabeth. 1973. “The Interpretation of Cicero’s De Legibus.” In ANRW, 4:334–56. 1.

Roberts, Jennifer Tolbert. 1997. Athens on Trial. Princeton University Press.

Schmidt, P. L. 1973. “Cicero ‘De Re Publica’: Die Forschung der letzten fünf Dezennien.” In ANRW, 4:262–333. 1.

———. 2001. “The Original Version of the De Re Publica and the De Legibus.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 45 (S76): 7–16. doi:10.1111/j.2041-5370.2001.tb02124.x.

Schmitt, Charles B. 1972. Cicero Scepticus: A Study of the Influence of the Academica in the Renaissance. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Schneewind, J. B. 2003. “Introduction.” In Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Jon Miller and Brad Inwood, 1–6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schofield, Malcolm. 1995. “Cicero’s Definition of Res Publica.” In Cicero the Philosopher, edited by J. G. F. Powell, 63–83. New York: Oxford University Press.

———. 2013. “Cosmopolitanism, Imperialism and Justice in Cicero’s Republic and Laws.” Intellectual History and Political Thought 2 (1): 5–34.

———. 2021. Cicero: Political Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.

———. 2023. “Iuris consensu Revisited.” In Power and Persuasion in Cicero’s Philosophy, edited by Nathan Gilbert, Margaret Graver and Sean McConnell, 119-139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shalev, Eran. 2009. Rome Reborn on Western Shores: Historical Imagination and the Creation of the American Republic. University of Virginia Press.

Sharpe, M. 2015. “Cicero, Voltaire, and the Philosophes in the French Enlightenment.” In W. H. F. Altman (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Cicero, 329-356. Brill: Leiden.

Skinner, Quentin. 1969. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8 (1): 3. doi:10.2307/2504188.

———. 1981. Machiavelli. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

———. 1998. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge University Press.

———. 2002. Visions of Politics: Volume 1, Regarding Method. Cambridge University Press.

———. 2008. Hobbes and Republican Liberty. Cambridge University Press.

Steel, Catherine, ed. 2013. The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stock, Brian. 1996. Augustine the Reader: Meditation, Self-Knowledge, and the Ethics of Interpretation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Straumann, Benjamin. 2006a. “The Right to Punish as a Just Cause of War in Hugo Grotius’ Natural Law.” Studies in the History of Ethics 2: 1–20.

———. 2006b. “‘Ancient Caesarian Lawyers’ in a State of Nature Roman Tradition and Natural Rights in Hugo Grotius’s De Iure Praedae.” Political Theory 34 (3): 328–50. doi:10.1177/0090591706286459.

———. 2007a. Hugo Grotius und die Antike: Römisches Recht und römische Ethik im frühneuzeitlichen Naturrecht. Nomos.

———. 2007b. “Natural Rights and Roman Law in Hugo Grotius’s Theses LVI, De Iure Praedae and Defensio Capitis Quinti Maris Liberi.” Grotiana 26 (1): 341–65. doi:10.1163/187607508X366454.

———. 2008. “Review of: Antike oder moderne Freiheit? Die Begründung der Demokratie in Athen und in der Neuzeit.”, October. http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2008/2008-10-31.html.

———. 2009. “Is Modern Liberty Ancient? Roman Remedies and Natural Rights in Hugo Grotius’s Early Works on Natural Law.” Law and History Review 27 (01): 55–86. doi:10.1017/S0738248000001656.

———. 2010a. “The Corpus iuris as a Source of Law Between Sovereigns in Alberico Gentili’s Thought.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, edited by Benedict Kingsbury and Benjamin Straumann, 101–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 2010b. “Roman Political Thought and the Modern Theoretical Imagination. By Dean Hammer. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2008. 358p. $39.95.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (02): 660–62. doi:10.1017/S1537592710000745.

———. 2011. “Constitutional Thought in the Late Roman Republic.” History of Political Thought 32 (2): 280–92.

———. 2013. “Consuls and the Roman Republic. H. Beck, A. Duplá, M. Jehne, F. Pina Polo (edd.) Consuls and Res Publica. Holding High Office in the Roman Republic. Pp. X + 376. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Cased, £65, US$110. ISBN: 978-1-107-00154-1. F. Pina Polo. The Consul at Rome. The Civil Functions of the Consuls in the Roman Republic. Pp. X + 379, Ills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Cased, £65, US$110. ISBN: 978-0-521-19083-1.” The Classical Review (New Series) 63 (01): 174–78. doi:10.1017/S0009840X12002909.

———. 2014a. “Review Peter Garnsey, Penser la propriété.” Classical Review 64 (2).

———. 2014b. “Crisis Management during the Roman Republic: The Role of Political Institutions in Emergencies. By Gregory K. Golden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. Pp. [xvii] + 245.” Classical Philology 109 (4).

———. 2014c. “La déclaration d’hostis sous la République romaine. By Annie Allély. Bordeaux: Ausonius Éditions, 2012 (Scripta Antiqua 47). Pp. 320. ISBN 978-2-35613-076-1. € 25.” Klio. Beiträge Zur Alten Geschichte 96 (2).

———. 2015. Roman Law in the State of Nature: The Classical Foundations of Hugo Grotius’ Natural Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.

———. 2016. Crisis and Constitutionalism: Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 2017a. “Imperium sine fine: Carneades, the Splendid Vice of Glory and the Justice of Empire.” In International Law and Empire, edited by Martti et al. Koskenniemi. History and Theory of International Law. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

———. 2017b. “A Reply to my Critics: Adam Smith's Unfinished Grotius Business, Grotius's Novel Turn to Ancient Law, and the Genealogical Fallacy.” Grotiana 38.1 (2017): 211-228.

———. 2017c. “Roman Ideas on the Loose.” Critical Analysis of Law 4.2 (2017): 141-151.

———. 2018. “The Roman Republic as a Constitutional Order from the Principate to the Renaissance.” In Republics and the Classical Past, 1500-1800, edited by W. Velema and A. Weststeijn. Metaforms. Studies in the Reception of Classical Antiquity. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.

———. 2020. “The Energy of Concepts: The Role of Concepts in Long-Term Intellectual History and Social Reality.” Journal of the Philosophy of History 14 (2020): 147-182.

———. 2021. “Is the Law the Soul of the State?” European Journal of International Law 32.3 (2021): 973-980.

———. 2023. “Rezension Malcolm Schofield, Cicero: Political Philosophy (OUP, 2021).” Gnomon 95.5 (2023): 423-428.

———. forthcoming. “Cicero und die Aufklärung in Basel.” In Cicero in Basel. Reception Histories from a Humanist City, ed. by C. Scheidegger Lämmle and E. Malaspina. Basel: Schwabe Verlag.

———. forthcoming. “Republicanism and Justice.” In The Oxford Handbook of Republicanism, ed. by F. Lovett and M. Sellers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stuart-Buttle, Tim. 2019. From Moral Theology to Moral Philosophy: Cicero and Visions of Humanity from Locke to Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Suerbaum, W. 1977. Vom antiken zum frühmittelalterlichen Staatsbegriff. Über Verwendung und Bedeutung von res publica, regnum, imperium und status von Cicero bis Jordanis. 3rd rev. Münster.

Testard, Maurice. 1958. Saint Augustin et Cicéron. Paris: Études augustiniennes.

Tierney, Brian. 1991. “Aristotle and the American Indians—again.” Cristianesimo nella storia 12: 295–322.

Tuck, Richard. 1993. Philosophy and Government, 1572-1651. Cambridge [England]; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

———. 1999. The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford University Press, USA.

Tuori, Kaius. 2009. “Alberico Gentili and the Criticism of Expansion in the Roman Empire. The Invader’s Remorse.” Journal of the History of International Law 11 (2): 205–19. doi:10.1163/138819909X12468857001389.

Visnjic, Jack. 2021. The Invention of Duty: Stoicism as Deontology. Leiden: Brill Publishers.

Wagner, Andreas. 2011. “Francisco de Vitoria and Alberico Gentili on the Legal Character of the Global Commonwealth.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31 (3): 565–82.

———. 2012. “Lessons of Imperialism and of the Law of Nations:Alberico Gentili’s Early Modern Appeal to Roman Law.” European Journal of International Law 23 (3): 873–86. doi:10.1093/ejil/chs051.

Warner, John M., and John T. Scott. 2011. “Sin City: Augustine and Machiavelli’s Reordering of Rome.” The Journal of Politics 73 (03): 857–71. doi:10.1017/S002238161100051X.

Weithman, Paul. 2001. “Augustine’s Political Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Augustine, edited by Eleonore Stump and Norman Kretzmann, 234–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://cco.cambridge.org/extract?id=ccol0521650186_CCOL0521650186A018.

Whitman, James Q. “Long Live the Hatred of Roman Law!” Rechtsgeschichte 2 (2003): 40-57.

———. “Western Legal Imperialism: Thinking About the Deep Historical Roots.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 10.2 (2009): 305-332.

Wood, Neal. 1991. Cicero’s Social and Political Thought. University of California Press.

Woolf, Raphael. 2015. Cicero: The Philosophy of a Roman Sceptic. Routledge.

———. 2021. “Unnatural Law: A Ciceronian Perspective.” In State and Nature, ed. by P. Adamson and C. Rapp. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.

———. ed. 2023. Cicero’s De Officiis: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zetzel, James E. G. 1996. “Natural Law and Poetic Justice: A Carneadean Debate in Cicero and Virgil.” Classical Philology, 297–319.

———. ed. 1999. Cicero: On the Commonwealth and On the Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. 2013. “A Contract on Ameria: Law and Legality in Cicero’s Pro Roscio Amerino.” American Journal of Philology 134, 425-444.

———. 2017. “Cicero on the Origins of Civilization and Society: The Preface to De re publica Book 3.” American Journal of Philology 138.3, 461-487.

———. 2017a. “The Attack on Justice: Cicero, Lactantius, and Carneads.” Rheinisches Museum 160, 299-319.

———. 2022. The Lost Republic: Cicero’s De oratore and De republica. New York: Oxford University Press.

Zielinski, Tadeusz. 1908. Cicero im Wandel der Jahrhunderte. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner. http://archive.org/details/ciceroimwandelde00zieluoft.